Propriedades psicométricas da versão abreviada da academic engagement scale (UWESS-9) em estudantes equatorianos

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35319/ajayu.212188

Palavras-chave:

Flexibilidade Psicológica, Adaptação, Validação, Propriedades Psicométricas, Análise Fatorial Confirmatória

Resumo

Este estudo tem como objetivo avaliar as propriedades psicométricas e a consistência interna da versão em espanhol do Inventário Multidimensional de Flexibilidade Psicológica (MPFI) em uma população geral da Argentina. Um total de 866 participantes com idades entre 18 e 84 anos (M = 47,33; DP = 17,26) e de ambos os sexos (homens = 40,9%; mulheres = 59,1%) participaram do estudo principal. Um modelo de ordem superior de 2 fatores resultou em índices de ajuste aceitáveis (NFI = 0,97; NNFI = 0,98; CFI = 0,98; IFI = 0,98; RMSEA 0,41). O MPFI espanhol também demonstrou invariância fatorial fraca (métrica) e forte (escalar) quando comparado ao MPFI inglês dado a uma amostra dos Estados Unidos (N = 1630; 18 a 85 anos, M = 50,1, SD = 18,7; 77,0% identificando-se como mulheres; 86,6% brancas). Os resultados indicaram uma consistência interna aceitável em todos os fatores (ω >.74). A adaptação para o espanhol do MPFI apresenta 60 e 24 itens semelhantes aos propostos pelos autores originais e propriedades psicométricas adequadas na amostra do estudo. Em relação às suas limitações, deve-se notar que os resultados apenas relatam a estrutura fatorial -validade fatorial- e a consistência interna -confiabilidade- do MPFI, o que é apenas uma primeira abordagem exploratória na adaptação da escala ao contexto local. Por esse motivo, pesquisas futuras devem continuar explorando as propriedades psicométricas do MPFI na Argentina.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Hugo Simkin, Universidad de Buenos Aires

For the last years, I've been teaching and researching the impact of migration on mental health. My research is focused on ex-pats around the world dealing with mental or emotional issues, such as anxiety, depression, trauma-related disorders, grief, or relationship problems. Here, you will find comprehensive information about my current research interests and teaching experience.

Agustin Freiberg-Hoffmann, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Trabajo en el diseño y/o adaptación de instrumentos psicométricos que evalúan variables psicoeducativas en estudiantes universitarios. Además, mis investigaciones contemplan en análisis de distintas variables psicoeducativas en relación al rendimiento académico.

Gabriela Caselli, Universidad Nacional de La Matanza

Comunicadora,  especializada en Comunicación Interna. Co-fundé Vector C (www.vectorc.com) Argentina (2011) y España (2016), y actualmente es Directora de proyectos Latam. Ha desarrollado sui carrera profesional como consultora de importantes compañías multinacionales. A través de la comunicación busca generar valor a la organización tanto para el negocio como para sus públicos. Valora la constante actualización profesional y compartir mejores prácticas con colegas, por eso tiene una intensa actividad como escritora, docente y disertante.

Paola Prozzillo, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Investigadora Argentina.

Ronald D. Rogge, University of Rochester

Ron Rogge es un miembro de la facultad clínica de la Universidad de Rochester, cuya investigación se centra en la comprensión de la dinámica dentro de las relaciones románticas y las familias.

Kelly G. Wilson, University of Mississippi

Kelly G. Wilson es profesor asistente en la Universidad de Mississippi y director del Centro para Psicología Contextual de dicha universidad; también es autor de varios libros y numerosos artículos y capítulos sobre los fundamentos empíricos, teóricos y filosóficos de ACT.

Referências

Aguirre-Camacho, A., & Moreno-Jiménez, B. (2017). La relevancia de la flexibilidad psicológica en el contexto del cáncer: una revisión de la literatura. Psicooncología, 14(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.5209/PSIC.55808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/PSIC.55808

Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2010). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. En G. R. Hancock, L. M. Stapleton, & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in Sciences, Social (pp. 93–114). Routledge.

Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the Performance of Maximum Likelihood Versus Means and Variance Adjusted Weighted Least Squares Estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2

Bolaños-Medina, A., & González-Ruiz, V. (2013). Deconstructing the Translation of Psychological Tests. Meta, 57(3), 715–739. https://doi.org/10.7202/1017088ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1017088ar

Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A Revised Measure of Psychological Inflexibility and Experiential Avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Cobos-Sánchez, L., Flujas-Contreras, J. M., & Gómez-Becerra, I. (2017). Intervención en flexibilidad psicológica como competencia emocional en adolescentes: una serie de casos. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 4(2), 135–141.

Doorley, J. D., Goodman, F. R., Kelso, K. C., & Kashdan, T. B. (2020). Psychological flexibility: What we know, what we do not know, and what we think we know. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/SPC3.12566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12566

Douglas, S., & Craig, S. S. (2007). Collaborative and Iterative Translation: An Alternative Approach to Instrument Translation. SSRN Electronic Journal, 15(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.946274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.946274

Flores, E. P. (2016). Flexibilidad psicológica y aceptación del dolor como variables predictoras de calidad de vida y bienestar emocional en personas con dolor crónico. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo.

Forsyth, J. P., & Eifert, G. H. (2008). The Mindfulness and Acceptance Workbook for Anxiety. A Guide to Breaking Free from Anxiety, Phobias, and Worry Using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. New Harbinger.

Greco, L. A., Lambert, W., & Baer, R. A. (2008). Psychological inflexibility in childhood and adolescence: Development and evaluation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Psychological Assessment, 20(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.93 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.93

Grégoire, S., Gagnon, J., Lachance, L., Shankland, R., Dionne, F., Kotsou, I., Monestès, J. L., Rolffs, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2020). Validation of the English and French versions of the multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory short form (MPFI-24). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 18(December 2019), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.06.004

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis (p. 816). Prentice Hall.

Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. An experiential Approach to behavior change. En Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Número 9). The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., Polusny, M. A., Dykstra, T. A., Batten, S. V., Bergan, J., Stewart, S. H., Zvolensky, M. J., Eifert, G. H., Bond, F. W., Forsyth, J. P., Karekla, M., & McCurry, S. M. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54(4), 553–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395492

Holgado-Tello, F. P., Morata-Ramirez, M. Á., & Barbero García, M. I. (2018). Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Ordinal Variables: A Simulation Study Comparing the Main Estimation Methods. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 36(3), 601. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.4932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.4932

Jordán Muiños, F. (2021). Valor de corte de los índices de ajuste en el análisis factorial confirmatorio. Psocial, 7(1), 66–71.

Kashdan, T. B., Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Doorley, J. D., & McKnight, P. E. (2020). Understanding psychological flexibility: A multimethod exploration of pursuing valued goals despite the presence of distress. Psychological Assessment, 32(9), 829–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000834

Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(4), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001

Kline, R. B. (2005). Structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.

Landi, G., Pakenham, K. I., Giovannetti, A. M., Presti, G., Boccolini, G., Cola, A., Grandi, S., & Tossani, E. (2021). Italian validation of the Italian multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory (MPFI). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 21, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCBS.2021.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.05.007

Lin, Y. Y., Rogge, R. D., & Swanson, D. P. (2020). Cross-cultural flexibility: Validation of the traditional Mandarin, simplified Mandarin, and Japanese translations of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 15(November), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.11.008

Medrano, L. A., & Muñoz-Navarro, R. (2017). Aproximación conceptual y práctica a los Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 11(1), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.11.486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.11.486

Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, ‎George A. (2011). Introduction to Psychometric Theory. Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841624

Robinson, M. (2018). Using multi-item psychometric scales for research and practice in human resource management. Human Resources Management, 57, 739-750. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21852 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21852

Rolffs, J. L., Rogge, R. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2018). Disentangling Components of Flexibility via the Hexaflex Model: Development and Validation of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). Assessment, 25(4), 458–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116645905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116645905

Rogge, R. D., Daks, J. S., Dubler, B. A., & Saint, K. J. (2019). It's all about the process: Examining the convergent validity, conceptual coverage, unique predictive validity, and clinical utility of ACT process measures. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 14, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.10.001

Ruiz, M. A., Pardo, A., & Martín, S. (2010). Modelos de ecuasiones estructurales. Papeles del psicólogo, 31(1), 34–45.

Seidler, D., Stone, B., Clark, B. E., Koran, J., & Drake, C. E. (2020). Evaluating the factor structure of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory: An independent replication and extension. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 17(April), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.04.007

Stabbe, O. K., Rolffs, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2019). Flexibly and/or inflexibly embracing life: Identifying fundamental approaches to life with latent profile analyses on the dimensions of the Hexaflex model. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 12, 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.03.003

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd DOI: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740

Ventura León, J. L., & Caycho Rodriguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente Omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625–627.

Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345

Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K. (2016). Robust Coefficients Alpha and Omega and Confidence Intervals With Outlying Observations and Missing Data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(3), 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415594658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415594658

Adaptation and validation into Spanish of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI): evidence of internal validity and factorial Invariance

Downloads

Publicado

2023-08-29

Como Citar

Simkin, H., Freiberg-Hoffmann, A., Caselli, G., Prozzillo, P., Rogge, R. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2023). Propriedades psicométricas da versão abreviada da academic engagement scale (UWESS-9) em estudantes equatorianos. Revista AJAYU, 21(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.35319/ajayu.212188

Edição

v. 21 n. 2 (2023): Revista AJAYU - agosto 2023

Seção

Artículos

Licença

Copyright (c) 2023 Revista AJAYU

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

De acuerdo a la Ley 1322 de Derechos de Autor en Bolivia, la revista de psicologia AJAYU respeta los derechos morales de los autores, amparando la parternidad e integridad de sus obras publicadas.