Structure of personal values and corruption: An experimental analysis of decisions leading to accepting or rejecting bribery



Palabras clave:

Corruption , bribery , personal values, corrupt relationship


Corruption is a legal and moral contravention that generates great concern among nations due to its erosive effects on economic growth, democracy, governance, social equity and the integrity of culture. Therefore, it is necessary to know more about the multiple variables that produce and maintain this phenomenon. This article reports the results of an experimental investigation that sought to provide elements of judgment on the influence of the structure of personal values on the willingness to bribe. For this, 12 couples of young university students of both sexes interacted through a game that simulated a relationship between a corrupter and a corruptible agent, with the help of a real-time communication system, mediated by an online platform, which allowed instant and bidirectional interaction. The couples were randomly constituted and played with each other under double blind. However, the interacting members of the dyad could share values or vary in their axiological structure in such a way that, while one of them could manifest anti-corruption principles, the other's commitment was not so obvious. The results confirm the importance of the axiological structure of people in the facilitation or containment of the corrupt behavior. This article also reflects on the theoretical connotations of the relationships shown.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Eric Roth, Universidad Católica Boliviana

Psicólogo con licenciatura y maestría de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) y doctorado en psicología social y métodos por la Universidad de Granada, España.

Guillermo Sahonero, Universidad Católica Boliviana

Investigador Boliviano, Ingeniero Mecatrónico.

Andrés Rodríguez, Universidad Católica Boliviana

Investigador Boliviano.


Abbink, K. (2002). Fair salaries and the moral cost of corruption. Nottingham, University of Nottingham, CeDEx Working Paper 2000-5.

Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., & Renner, E. (2000). The moonlighting game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 22, 265-277.

Abbink, K. & Hennig-Schmidt (2002). Neutral versus instructions in a bribery experiment. Nottingham, University of Nottingham, CeDEx Working Paper No. 13

Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., & Renner, E. (2002). An experimental bribery game. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 18(2), 428-454.

Abraham J. & Pane, M.M. (2014). Corruptive Tendencies, Conscientiousness, and Collectivism. AMER International Conference on Quality of Life. Sutera Harbour, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia, 4-5 January.

Abraham, J. & Pea, A.G. (2018). Can proneness to moral emotions detect corruption? The mediating role of ethical judgment based on unified ethics. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, Available online 4 August 2018.

Abraham, J., Suleeman, J. & Takwin, B. (2018). Psychological Mechanism of Corruption: A Comprehensive Review. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 11, 587-604.

Abraham, J., Suleeman, J. & Takwin, B. (2019). The Psychology of Corruption: The Role of the Counterfeit Self, Entity Self-Theory, and Outcome-Based Ethical Mindset. Journal of Psychological & Educational Research 26 (2), 7-32 (2018).

Bailey, J. (2006). Corruption and Democratic Governability in Latin America: Issues of Types, Arenas, Perceptions, and Linkages. Delivered at the 2006 Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, San Juan, Puerto Rico, March 15-18, 2006.

Balafoutas, L. (2011). Public beliefs and corruption in a repeated psychological game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 78 (1-2), 51-59.

Blake, C.H. & Morris, S.D. (2009). Corruption and Democracy in Latin America. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press.

Cameron, L.A., Chaudhuri, A., Erkal, N. & Gangadharan, L. (2005). Do Attitudes Towards Corruption Differ Across Cultures? Experimental Evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore. Available at SSRN: or

Connelly B.S. & Ones, D.S. (2008).The Personality of Corruption: A National-Level Analysis. Cross-Cultural Research, 42(4), 353-385.

Damodar, S. & Rooplekha, K. (2010). Influence of personal values and value congruence on unethical practices and work behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 443-460.

Dion, M. (2010), Corruption and ethical relativism: what is at stake? Journal of Financial Crime, 17(2), 240-250.

Dong, B, Dulleck, U. & Torgler, B. (2011). Conditional corruption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(3), 609-627.

Dusek, L., Ortmann, A. & Lizal, L. (2005). Understanding corruption and corruptibility through experiments. Prague Economics Papers, 2, 147-162.

Goodman, M. (1974). Does Political Corruption Really Help Economic Development? Polity, 7, 143-162.

Gupta, S., Davoodi, H.R. & Alonso, R. (2002). Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? Economics of Governance, 3, 23-45.

Hooker, J. (2009). Corruption from a cross-cultural perspective. Cross Cultural Management, 16 (3), 251-267. Köbis, N.C., Iragorri-Carter, D. & Starke, C. (2018) A Social Psychological View on the Social Norms of Corruption.

Kubbe & A. Engelbert (Eds). Corruption and Norms. Why Informal Rules Matter (pp 31-52). Springer Nature Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI ISBN 978-3-319-66253-4

Kravtsova, M., Oshchepkov, A., Welzel, C. (2016). Values and Corruption: Do Post-Materialists Justify Bribery? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(2), 225-242

Kreikebaum, H. (2008). Corruption as a moral issue, Social Responsibility Journal, 4(1-2), 82-88.

Marquette, H. (2011). ‘Finding god’ or ‘moral disengagement’ in the fight against corruption in developing countries? Evidence from India and Nigeria. Public Administration and Development, Published online in Wiley Online Library (

Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681-712.

Mauro, Paolo, The Effects of Corruption on Growth, Investment, and Government Expenditure (September 1996). IMF Working Paper No. 96/98, Available at SSRN:

Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69, 263-279.

Manz, C.C., Joshi, M. & Anand, V. (2005). The role of values and emotions in newcomers' socialization into organizational corruption. Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper 2005 SIM: J1. Published Online: 30 Nov 2017:

Manz, C.C., Anand, V., Joshi, M. & Manz, K.P. (2008). Emerging paradoxes in executive leadership: A theoretical interpretation of the tensions between corruption and virtuous values. The Leadership Quarterly, 19 (3), 385-392.

Moreno, A. (2003). Corruption and Democracy: A Cultural Assessment, in R. Inglehart (Ed), Human Values and Social Change: Findings from the Values Surveys (pp. 265-277). Boston: Brill.

Napal, G. (2006). An assessment of the ethical dimensions that impact on corruption. EJBO-Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 11, pp. 5-9.

O’Connor, S & Fischer, R. (2011). Predicting societal corruption across time: Values, Wealth, or Institutions? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology XX(X) 1–16.

Olken, B.A. (2009. Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality. Journal of Public Economics, 93(7-8), 950-964

Pande, S. & Jain, N. (2014). Relation between personal values and corruption permissiveness of government servants in India and the moderating role of dissatisfaction with the financial condition of the family. International Review of Public Administration, 19 (2), 126-142.

Roth, E. & Acosta, B. (2016). Disposición a sobornar: Influencias contextuales e implicaciones cognitivas de la conducta corrupta. Ajayu, 16(1), 60-81.

Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65

Schwartz, S.H. & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550-562). Seleim, A. & Bontis, N. (2009). The relationship between culture and corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Intellectual Capital 10(1), 165-184.

Shafer, W., Fukukawa, K. & Lee, G. (2007) Values and the Perceived Importance of Ethics and Social Responsibility: The U.S. versus China. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(3), 265-284.

Shawa, P.,Vásquez, W.F. & LeClair, M. (2013). Intelligence and bribing behavior in a one-shot game. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 44, 91-96 Siegel, D.S. (1980). Estadística no paramétrica aplicada a las ciencias de la conducta. México: Trillas.

Tavits, M. (2008). Representation, corruption, and subjective well-being Comparative Political Studies, 41(12), 1607-1630.

Ullah, A. & Shah, M. (2013). Does Pakistani Society Accept Corruption as a Changed Value with Reference to Religious Perspective? International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 13(1), 69-74. @ February 2013 IJENS.

Structure of personal values and corruption: An experimental analysis of decisions leading to accepting or rejecting bribery




Cómo citar

Roth, E., Sahonero, G., & Rodriguez, A. (2023). Structure of personal values and corruption: An experimental analysis of decisions leading to accepting or rejecting bribery. Revista AJAYU, 21(1), 15–36.